Cadman Mills Highlights Early Signs of Sycophancy in Mahama’s Potential Administration
Cadman Mills, brother of the late President John Evans Atta Mills, has expressed serious concerns about emerging patterns of behavior within the National Democratic Congress (NDC) as the party prepares for a potential administration under John Dramani Mahama. Mills specifically highlighted what he sees as signs of sycophancy among individuals and institutions eager to secure favor with Mahama and his family. In a post on X (formerly Twitter) dated December 29, 2024, Mills outlined examples of what he deemed excessive flattery aimed at ingratiating certain individuals with the incoming government. Among the instances he cited was a public suggestion advocating for Sharaf Mahama, the son of John Dramani Mahama, to be appointed Minister of Sports. Proponents of this idea pointed to Sharaf’s personal interest in the sports sector, particularly boxing, as justification for his consideration. Mills firmly rejected this notion, arguing that public office appointments should be based on merit and competence rather than familial ties or flattery. He noted that Ghanaians expect a higher standard of governance from the NDC following their removal from office after Mahama’s first term in 2017. “Ghanaians deserve better than family appointments influenced by sycophancy. The incoming administration must deliver results that surpass those of the past,” Mills emphasized. While acknowledging the optimism surrounding a new Mahama-led administration, Mills cautioned against assuming its success is guaranteed. He reminded the public that the NDC’s prior tenure under Mahama from 2013 to 2017 left much to be desired, leading to their electoral defeat. “A JDM-led NDC administration is not new to Ghanaian politics,” he wrote. “We can hope this administration will be better than its first incarnation, but it is not a foregone conclusion. Already, the early signs of sycophancy are troubling.” Mills also raised alarm over discussions advocating constitutional amendments to extend Mahama’s potential tenure beyond the existing term limits. He criticized such proposals as harmful to Ghana’s democratic principles and warned against emulating undemocratic precedents from other nations. “It is particularly alarming that, even before taking office, there are calls to amend the constitution to allow the incoming president to contest for an additional term. This would amount to a cumulative 12 years in office if he were to win in 2028. Why should Ghana tread this dangerous path? Have we not learned from the experiences of other countries?” Mills questioned. The comments from Cadman Mills underscore his broader apprehensions about the direction of political discourse within the NDC and the potential impact…
Read moreDispute Arises Over Akufo-Addo’s Alleged Refusal of Mahama’s Presidential Entitlements
The recent controversy surrounding President Nana Akufo-Addo and former President John Dramani Mahama over alleged denial of presidential entitlements has sparked widespread debate in Ghana. Mahama, who served as president from 2012 to 2017, claimed that certain benefits he is entitled to under Ghanaian law have not been honored by the Akufo-Addo administration. These entitlements reportedly include housing, security, and logistical provisions meant to ensure the dignity and well-being of former heads of state. The matter gained attention following Mahama’s remarks suggesting that the Akufo-Addo government has deliberately withheld these benefits. This claim has drawn criticism from opposition figures and sections of the public who see it as a breach of protocol and respect for democratic transitions. Mahama, now the flagbearer of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), has used the issue to criticize the governance style of Akufo-Addo, painting it as partisan and dismissive of legal obligations. On the other hand, the Akufo-Addo administration has either denied the allegations or remained silent on the specifics, further intensifying speculation. Supporters of the government argue that Mahama’s claims are politically motivated and designed to garner sympathy ahead of the upcoming elections. They suggest that any logistical issues might be the result of administrative delays rather than deliberate neglect. This dispute has broader implications for governance in Ghana. It raises questions about the consistent application of laws designed to protect former presidents, who have played crucial roles in the country’s democratic development. The issue also brings to light the challenges of political polarization, where governance decisions are often viewed through the lens of partisanship. Furthermore, the controversy highlights the importance of fostering institutional trust and respect for national leaders, regardless of their political affiliations. Legal experts have pointed out that failure to uphold the provisions of presidential entitlements undermines the country’s democratic principles and could deter future leaders from serving with confidence. As the nation moves closer to critical elections, this issue is likely to remain in the spotlight. Political observers suggest it could influence voter sentiment, particularly among those who value fairness, accountability, and respect in governance. The ongoing debate underscores the need for transparency and institutional reform to avoid similar conflicts in the future
Read more

















