• Metascholar News Portal
• Opinions
• January 11, 2025
• 173 views
• 4 minutes Read

14 universities with publication metrics researchers say are too good to be true

The academic world is abuzz with revelations surrounding the evolving role of bibliometrics in evaluating university performance and its controversial implications for authorship practices. Recent developments, as highlighted by Retraction Watch on January 10, 2025, shed light on a growing debate: are these metrics advancing academic excellence or undermining its integrity? Bibliometrics: A Double-Edged Sword Bibliometric analysis, which measures the impact of research through publication and citation metrics, has become a cornerstone for academic evaluations worldwide. Universities increasingly rely on these metrics to rank departments, allocate funding, and assess individual researchers. While bibliometrics offers a quantitative method to measure academic output, critics argue that it incentivizes quantity over quality, leading to a proliferation of low-impact publications and questionable authorship practices. Authorship Disputes on the Rise A startling trend emerging from these metrics-driven environments is the manipulation of authorship. Instances of undeserved authorship, such as including senior administrators or funders with minimal contribution to the research, are reportedly rising. Such practices dilute the value of genuine academic contributions and undermine the collaborative spirit of research. In a case brought to light in the Retraction Watch report, several universities have faced scrutiny for policies that prioritize bibliometric outcomes at the expense of ethical research practices. Researchers are under immense pressure to publish in high-impact journals, often leading to undue haste, subpar studies, and ethical lapses in authorship. Global Reactions and Institutional Reforms The academic community is not taking these revelations lightly. Calls for reform are growing louder, with scholars urging universities to balance bibliometric evaluations with qualitative assessments of research impact. Leading institutions, including some of the world’s top-ranking universities, are revisiting their tenure and funding criteria to ensure ethical standards are upheld. Those 14 universities are:  University Articles published, 2019 Articles published, 2023 % change Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 127 1,368 977 Chandigarh University, Punjab, India  362 2,281 530 GLA University, Bharthia, India 259 1,521 487 Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India 847 2,219 162 Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India 1,984 3,959 100 University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Uttarakhand, India 307 1,557 407 Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hilla, Iraq 91 1,417 1,457 Lebanese American University, Beirut 316 2,600 723 Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia* 370 1,591 330 King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia 1,329 5,145 287 King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 4,493 11,906 165 Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia 750 4,388 485 Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman…